MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,228 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,228 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 28 of 65

Labels cover 2 of 3,228 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,228 of 3,228 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
CDC Sage field pea
Albert Vandenberg, Sabine Banniza, Brent Barlow, Scott Ife
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Eurostar durum wheat
J. M. Clarke, R. E. Knox, R. M. DePauw, F. R. Clarke, T. N. McCaig, M. R. Fernandez +1 more
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Muchmore hard red spring wheat
R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox, T. N. McCaig, F. R. Clarke, J. M. Clarke
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affvenueunlabeled
ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL FORAGES FOR FALL/WINTER GRAZING
E. J. McGeough, Douglas J. Cattani, Zachary Koscielny, Brittainy Hewitt, Kim Ominski
2017· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Sadash soft white spring wheat
R. S. Sadasivaiah, R. J. Graf, Harpinder Randhawa, Brian L. Beres, S.M. Perkovic, M Virginillo
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Agronomic practices for red lentil in Alberta
R. Bowness, Mark A. Olson, D. Pauly, Ross H. McKenzie, Casey W. Hoy, K. S. Gill +1 more
2019· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Reward field pea
Deng‐Jin Bing, Al Sloan, Don Beauchesne, R. L. Conner, Yantai Gan, Cecil Vera +5 more
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About