MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,772 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,772 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 36

Labels cover 0 of 1,772 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,772 of 1,772 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Super-rigid Donaldson-Thomas Invariants
Kai Behrend, Jim Bryan
2007· article· en· Mathematical Research Letters· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Singularities of admissible normal functions
Patrick Brosnan, Hao Fang, Zhaohu Nie, Gregory Pearlstein
2009· article· en· Inventiones mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
Hypergeometric Abelian Varieties
Natália Archinard
2003· article· en· Canadian Journal of Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Parabolic Refined Invariants and Macdonald Polynomials
Wu-yen Chuang, Duiliu-Emanuel Diaconescu, Ron Donagi, Tony Pantev
2014· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Gysin maps in Balmer–Witt theory
Alexander Nenashev
2007· article· en· Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Normality of Torus Orbit Closures in G/P
James B. Carrell, Alexandre Kurth
2000· article· en· Journal of Algebra· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Counting integral ideals in a number field
M. Ram Murty, Jeanine Van Order
2006· article· en· Expositiones Mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Milnor–Witt K-groups of local rings
Stefan Gille, Stephen Scully, Changlong Zhong
2015· article· en· Advances in Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Binomial Thue equations and polynomial powers
Michael A. Bennett, Kálmán Győry, Max Mignotte, Ákos Pintér
2006· article· en· Compositio Mathematica· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About