MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,448 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,448 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 29

Labels cover 4 of 1,448 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,448 of 1,448 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
DataInk
Haijun Xia, Nathalie Henry Riche, Fanny Chevalier, Bruno De Araujo, Daniel Wigdor
2018· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
afffundunlabeled
Capturing and supporting the analysis process
Nazanin Kadivar, Victor Chen, Dustin Dunsmuir, Eric Lee, Zhenyu Cheryl Qian, John C. Dill +2 more
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
affunlabeled
Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data
Cindy Xiong, Joel Shapiro, Jessica Hullman, Steven Franconeri
2019· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Filtering and brushing with motion
Lyn Bartram, Colin Ware
2002· article· en· Information Visualization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
affunlabeled
I've seen "enough"
Sajjadur Rahman, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Ha‐Kyung Kong, Eric Blais, Karrie Karahalios, Aditya Parameswaran +1 more
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
69
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Evaluating ‘Graphical Perception’ with CNNs
Daniel Haehn, James Tompkin, Hanspeter Pfister
2018· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
68
citations
affunlabeled
FpVAT
Carson K. Leung, Christopher L. Carmichael
2010· article· en· ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
68
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Data Murals: Using the Arts to Build Data Literacy
Rahul Bhargava, Ricardo Kadouaki, Emily Bhargava, Guilherme V. Castro, Catherine D’Ignazio
2016· article· en· The Journal of Community Informatics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
affunlabeled
ConVisIT
Enamul Hoque, Giuseppe Carenini
2015· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Visualization of Uncertainty and Reasoning
Torre Zuk, Sheelagh Carpendale
2007· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
Data Visualization on Interactive Surfaces: A Research Agenda
Petra Isenberg, Tobias Isenberg, Tobias Hesselmann, Bongshin Lee, Ulrich von Zadow, Anthony Tang
2013· article· en· IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
ValueCharts
Giuseppe Carenini, John Loyd
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
affunlabeled
eSeeTrack—Visualizing Sequential Fixation Patterns
Hoi Ying Tsang, Melanie Tory, Charles Swindells
2010· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
afffundunlabeled
Spatialization Design: Comparing Points and Landscapes
Melanie Tory, David Sprague, Fuqu Wu, Wing Yan So, Tamara Munzner
2007· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
62
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Planning Horizon for Movement Sequences
Giacomo Ariani, Neda Kordjazi, J. Andrew Pruszynski, Jörn Diedrichsen
2021· article· en· eNeuro· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
57
citations
affunlabeled
Mnemonic rendering
Anastasia Bezerianos, Pierre Dragicevic, Ravin Balakrishnan
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About