MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,312 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,312 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 27

Labels cover 8 of 1,312 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,312 of 1,312 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Book history in the reading experience
Mary Hammond
2014· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Whatever happened to interchange?
Martin Holmes
2016· article· en· Digital Scholarship in the Humanities· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Encyclopedia of semiotics
Frank Nuessel
2012· article· es· Semiotica· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Materials and meanings
Peter Stoicheff
2014· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
The lognormal handwriter: learning, performing and declining
Réjean Plamondon, Christian O’Reilly, Céline Rémi, Thérésa Duval
2013· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Crowdsourcing Downunder
Rachel Hendery, Jason Gibson
2019· article· en· KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
CSE as Epistemic Technologies
Matt Ratto
2011· book-chapter· en· Advances in computer and electrical engineering book series· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About