MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,317 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,317 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 27

Labels cover 0 of 1,317 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,317 of 1,317 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Sideshadow Interview: Illuminating Process
Rebecca Luce‐Kapler
2006· article· en· International Journal of Qualitative Methods· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Controversy as News Discourse
Peter Cramer
2011· book· en· Argumentation library· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Dialogic Absurdity
Zoë Druick
2009· article· en· Television & New Media· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
afffundunlabeled
Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review
Syavash Nobarany, Kellogg S. Booth
2014· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluative expressions in analystical arguments
Wu Mei, Desmond Allison
2007· article· en· Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
The Taming of the Text
Willie van Peer
2016· book· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Looking out
James R. Martin
2014· article· en· Linguistics and the Human Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Shifting Tradition: Writing Research in Canada
Jennifer Clary-Lemon
2009· article· en· The American Review of Canadian Studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Graduate Research Writing: A Pedagogy of Possibility
Cecile Badenhorst, Cecilia Moloney, Janna Rosales, Jennifer Dyer
2012· article· en· LEARNing Landscapes· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About