MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

310 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
310 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 7

Labels cover 9 of 310 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 310 of 310 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
User-Centered Internet Research
2004· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Analysis of Thin Online Interview Data
2007· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
13
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Focus Groups with Children: Do They Work?
2001· article· en· Canadian journal of information science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Focus Groups
2023· book-chapter· en· Springer texts in education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
8
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Googled ethnographer
2013· article· en· Qualitative Research Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+sts+insufficient_payload
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About