MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutgemma · bibliometrics+metaresearchgpt · metaresearch+bibliometricsmodels agree
Impact of collaborative research on academic science
Benoı̂t Godin, Yves Gingras
2000· article· en· Science and Public Policy· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
119
citations
affunlabeled
Citation analysis of scientific categories
Gregory S. Patience, Christian Patience, Bruno Blais, François Bertrand
2017· article· en· Heliyon· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
117
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The SciELO Open Access: A Gold Way from the South
Abel L. Packer
2010· article· en· Canadian Journal of Higher Education· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
101
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
Lorraine E. Ferris, Margaret A. Winker
2017· review· en· Biochemia Medica· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
97
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science
Fei Shu, Charles‐Antoine Julien, Lin Zhang, Junping Qiu, Jing Zhang, Vincent Larivière
2019· article· en· Journal of Informetrics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
95
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions
Vesna Ilakovac, Kristina Fišter, Matko Marušić, Ana Marušić
2006· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
94
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Top cited articles in thermodynamic research
Hui‐Zhen Fu, Yuh‐Shan Ho
2015· article· en· Journal of Engineering Thermophysics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
92
citations
affno abstractgemma · bibliometrics+metaresearchgpt · metaresearch+bibliometricsmodels split
The classification of biomedical journals by research level
Grant Lewison, Guillermo Paraje
2004· article· en· Scientometrics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
89
citations
affunlabeled
The publication gender gap in psychology.
Darko Odic, Erica H. Wojcik
2019· article· en· American Psychologist· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
86
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · bibliometrics+metaresearchmodels split
The power of altmetrics on a CV
Heather Piwowar, Jason R Priem
2013· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
86
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About