MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Signs of analyticity in single-field inflation
Daniel Baumann, Daniel Green, Hayden Lee, Rafael A. Porto
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
139
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dark matter search results from the PICO-60<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>CF</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>bubble chamber
C. Amole, M. Ardid, D. M. Asner, D. Baxter, E. Behnke, Pijushpani Bhattacharjee +53 more
2016· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
138
citations
afffundgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Holographic thermodynamics of accelerating black holes
Andrès Anabalòn, Michael Appels, Ruth Gregory, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann, Ali Övgün
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
137
citations
affunlabeled
Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements
K. Lodha, R. Calderón, William L. Matthewson, Arman Shafieloo, M Ishak, Jian Pan +117 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
afffundunlabeled
Chaos and complexity in quantum mechanics
Tibra Ali, Arpan Bhattacharyya, S. Shajidul Haque, Eugene H. Kim, Nathan Moynihan, Jeff Murugan
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
124
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black holes in Einsteinian cubic gravity
Robie A. Hennigar, Robert B. Mann
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
119
citations
afffundunlabeled
Improved constraints on neutrino mixing from the T2K experiment with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>protons on target
K. Abe, N. Akhlaq, R. Akutsu, A. Ali, C. Alt, C. Andreopoulos +317 more
2021· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
116
citations
afffundunlabeled
Generalized quasitopological gravity
Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About