MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,961 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,961 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 30 of 40

Labels cover 3 of 1,961 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,961 of 1,961 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Bridging the Communication Gap
Andy Griffith, Stacy Haverstick, Deb Blissick, Teresa Colaianne, Heidi Shields, Caty Johnson +4 more
2019· article· en· Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
First-in-Canada Use of Novel Heart Preservation System
Lebei Pi, Vivek Rao, Filio Billia, Diego Delgado, Michael McDonald, Yas Moayedi +1 more
2024· article· en· Canadian Journal of Cardiology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Clinical trials
Jonathon P. Fanning, Stephan Dobner, Martin Urner, Jan Bělohlávek, Giles J. Peek
2024· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Shock Team: A Case for the Multispecialty Critical Care
Yanika Wolfe, Christopher Noël, Nitin Puri, Jason Bartock, Michael Rosenbloom, Adam Green
2025· letter· en· Canadian Journal of Cardiology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Cardiogenic Shock
Abdulwahab Hritani, Suhail Allaqaband, Muhammad Fuad Jan
2017· book-chapter· en· Interventional Cardiology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Prone transportation to an ECMO center
Anton Nikouline, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, John Granton
2021· article· en· Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
CARDIAC TRANSPLANT -A SINGLE CENTRE RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATION
Parthasarathy Laxmanan, Kayalvizhi K Balasundaram, Kalaivani Nadar, V Muthu, Charankumar Natarajan
2020· article· en· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About