MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,311 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,311 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 31 of 47

Labels cover 23 of 2,311 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,311 of 2,311 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Introduction
M. Joseph Boyle, David Novák
2008· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
A Critical Appraisal of the CAMRT Code of Ethics
John Hubert, Cindy Murphy
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Teaching Ethics in Canadian Gastroenterology
Guido Van Rosendaal
2004· letter· en· Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Chapitre 4. Faire société avec les animaux ?
Jocelyne Porcher
2013· article· fr· Journal international de bioéthique et d éthique des sciences· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
In Praise of Wisdom: A Morality Tale
Harvey Max Chochinov
2022· editorial· en· Journal of Palliative Medicine· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Rescuing charitable duties
Sheldon Wein
2002· article· en· International Journal of Social Economics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Missing the Forest for the Trees
Jordan Potter
2024· article· en· Canadian Journal of Bioethics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Case Commentary
Ann B. Hamric
2000· article· en· Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
A year of listening, focusing and action
Roger Collier
2015· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About