MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 34 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Politics and Judgment
2005· article· en· Discover Archive (Vanderbilt University)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Legislated Rights in the Real World
Grégoire Webber, Paul Yowell
2020· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Myths of Judicial Activism
Kent Roach
2001· article· en· Supreme Court law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Theory of Judicial Constitutional Design
Roberto Mancilla
2017· article· en· International Journal of Political Theory· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Constitutional Cases 2015: An Overview
Lorne Sossin
2016· article· en· Supreme Court law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
1. Introduction: Courts in Federal Countries
Nicholas Aroney, John Kincaid
2017· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Foreword
2012· article· en· Digital USD (University of San Diego)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Courts in Federal Countries
2017· other· en· OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About