MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 34 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Weak solutions in Einstein theory and beyond
Francesco Fazzini, Hassan Mehmood
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
MINER reactor based search for axionlike particles using sapphire ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) detectors
M. Mirzakhani, W. Baker, M. Chaudhuri, James B. Dent, R. Dey, Bhaskar Dutta +17 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Orbit method for quantum corner symmetries
Giulio Neri, Ludovic Varrin
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Primordial black holes and the first stars
Julia Monika Koulen, Stefano Profumo, Nolan Smyth
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Spacetime measurements with the photon ring
Rahul Kumar, Prashant Kocherlakota, Dominic O. Chang, Kiana Salehi
2025· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quenched entanglement harvesting
Adrian Lopez-Raven, Robert B. Mann, Jorma Louko
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About