MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Vaccine
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,703 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,703 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 34 of 35

Labels cover 4 of 1,703 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,703 of 1,703 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to Brundage and Shanks
Kandace Bogaert
2016· letter· en· Vaccine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to Letter to the Editor
Paul Van Buynder
2015· letter· en· Vaccine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Corrigendum to “A Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants (PNEU-PED-EU-1)” [Vaccine 41 (2023) 3387–3398]
Federico Martinón‐Torres, Jacek Wysocki, Leszek Szenborn, Alfonso Carmona-Martinez, Airi Põder, Ron Dagan +13 more
2025· erratum· en· Vaccine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preface
E Kurstak
2003· article· en· Vaccine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The case for ILI surveillance
Roger E. Thomas
2015· letter· en· Vaccine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
Corrigendum to “A nested case-control study measuring pertussis vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection in Manitoba, Canada, 1992–2015: A Canadian Immunization Research Network Study” [Vaccine 37(48) (2019) 7132–7137]
Krista M. Wilkinson, Christiaan H. Righolt, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Kevin L. Schwartz, Margaret L. Russell, Natasha S. Crowcroft +1 more
2022· erratum· en· Vaccine· Immunology and Microbiology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
[no title]
Prof.Dr.Edouard Kurstak
2005· article· en· Vaccine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preface
Edouard Kurstak
2009· editorial· en· Vaccine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Introduction
Eleanor N. Fish, Christine Stabell Benn, Sabra L. Klein
2022· editorial· en· Vaccine· Immunology and Microbiology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About