MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 36 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Public Responses to Unilateral Policymaking
B. Goehring, Kenneth Lowande
2024· article· en· Journal of Experimental Political Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Optimal Majority Rule in Referenda
Qingqing Cheng, Ming Li
2019· article· en· Games· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Special Issue Conclusion
Hannah Bucher, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Axel M. Burger, Thorsten Faas, Harald Schoen, Marc Debus +15 more
2022· article· en· Politische Vierteljahresschrift· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Government Party
R. Kenneth Carty
2022· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Losers’ Consent in a Deliberative Assembly
André Blais, Jean‐François Daoust, Ruth Dassonneville, Patrick Fournier
2025· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Canada: Political Developments and Data in 2022
David Stewart
2023· article· en· European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Conservative Origin
Kyle Morrison
2025· book-chapter· en· Springer Studies in American Politics.· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Political Capital
Benjamin D.T. Smith
2020· article· en· Constellations· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About