MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 37 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Mixmaster dynamics in the dust time gauge
Masooma Ali, Viqar Husain
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
A STUDY OF THE DE BROGLIE GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
A. Feoli, S. R. Valluri
2004· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Dynamical inflection point inflation
Y. Bai, Daniel Stolarski
2021· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Cosmological decoherence from thermal gravitons
Ning Bao
2023· article· en· OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmic coincidence or graviton mass?
Saurya Das
2014· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
THE PHANTOM OF THE OPRA
A. A. Coley, Sigbjørn Hervik, Joey Latta
2006· article· en· Modern Physics Letters A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Collapse and bounce of null fluids
Bradley Creelman, Ivan Booth
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Vacuum Instability
Paul S. Wesson
2006· article· en· Foundations of Physics Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Ring wormholes and time machines
Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, Andrei Zelnikov
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
A theory of giant vortices
Alexander A. Penin, Quinten Weller
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Qualitative properties of magnetic fields in scalar field cosmology
Chris Clarkson, A. A. Coley, S. D. Quinlan
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
TESTING STRONG MOND BEHAVIOR IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM
João Magueijo, Jacob D. Bekenstein
2007· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Preheating in an asymptotically safe quantum field theory
Ole Svendsen, Hossein Bazrafshan Moghaddam, Robert Brandenberger
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Almost-Killing conserved currents: A general mass function
Milton Ruiz, Carlos Palenzuela, C. Bona
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About