MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 37 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Constitutional Development of Canada
Hubert Chabowski
2024· article· en· Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Editorial Introduction
Hoi L. Kong, Margot Young
2024· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Towards a Written Constitution
W. Elliot Bulmer
2020· book-chapter· en· Policy Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
L'égalité selon la Cour suprême
Denis Bourque
2005· article· en· Les Cahiers de droit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Filling the Bench
David A. Yalof
2009· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
7 Conclusions
Goldsworthy Jeffrey
2007· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Bruce Ziff's Legal History
Eric M. Adams
2023· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Judicial Review of Rulemaking
Douglas Sarro
2025· article· en· McGill Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About