MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 39 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
Is Canadian Constitutional Law Canadian?
Dwight Newman
2023· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Democratizing Influence of Intervention
Geoffrey D. Callaghan
2024· article· en· Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Introduction
Patricia Paradis
2013· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Measuring Legislative Boundaries
Christopher P. Chambers, Alan D. Miller
2011· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Legislated Rights in the real world
Grégoire Webber, Paul Yowell
2020· article· en· Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Access to Justice
Rachel Hale
2022· other· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Introduction
Patricia Paradis
2016· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About