MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

368 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
368 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 8

Labels cover 2 of 368 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 368 of 368 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Editor's Welcome
Karen McGarry
2021· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Engagement, Debates and Beyond
2011· article· en· Anthropology News· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Tyranny of the Abstract
Derek Sayer
2025· article· en· Sociology Lens· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Respect for Bill Reid Pole
Aldona Jonaitis
2006· article· en· Museum Anthropology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
<scp>T</scp>ax,<scp>S</scp>ol (1907–95)
Joshua J. Smith
2018· other· en· The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Us anthropologie
Virginia R. Domínguez
2020· article· fr· Anthropen· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Making Steel: Understanding the Lived Experience
Elizabeth Beaton
2009· article· en· Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Anthropology of the USA
Emily Metzner
2024· article· en· Anthropen· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Think Pieces in Analytics
Martin Holbraad, Yang Liu, Thomas M. Malaby, Daniel Miller, Sevasti‐Melissa Nolas, Christos Varvantakis
2019· article· en· Social Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
2011 AAA Annual Meeting Preview
2011· article· en· Anthropology News· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Thoughts on the Return of Yesterday's War
David W. Jardine
2017· article· en· Journal of Applied Hermeneutics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Academic Culture in the Petri Dish
E. Morgan
2003· article· en· PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
the lies project, 2004-2005
Emily Hermant
2006· article· en· UnderCurrents Journal of Critical Environmental Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Noble Savages, Ignoble Colleagues
I. C. Jarvie
2014· article· en· Philosophy of the Social Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Ethnographic Variations
2025· article· en· Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Section News
2009· article· en· Anthropology News· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Living in the Telling
Hine Funaki, Liana MacDonald, Johanna Knox, Daniel McKinnon
2024· article· en· Art/Research International A Transdisciplinary Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Giant Who Had No Heart
L. Moody Simms
2004· article· en· Teaching and Learning· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Section News
2012· article· en· Anthropology News· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About