MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

552 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
552 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 12

Labels cover 0 of 552 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 552 of 552 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Measuring attitudes as a complex system
Jordan Mansell, Steven Mock, Carter Rhea, Adrienne Tecza, Jinelle Piereder
2021· article· en· Politics and the Life Sciences· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Is the ‘cognitive revolution’ a myth?
Sandy Hobbs, Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
2009· article· en· Psychologist· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
The perception–action cycle
S. Haykin
2012· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Separating Planning and Attention
Gautam Puhan, J. P. Das, Jack A. Naglieri
2005· article· en· Canadian Journal of School Psychology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Granular cognitive maps: a review
Rafael Falcón, Gonzalo Nápoles, Rafael Bello, Koen Vanhoof
2018· review· en· Granular Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
The Cognitive Process of Decision Making
Yingxu Wang, Guenther Ruhe
2011· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Exploration patterns shape cognitive map learning
Iva K. Brunec, Melissa Nantais, Jennifer E. Sutton, Russell A. Epstein, Nora S. Newcombe
2022· preprint· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Review: Resisting Cognitive Science
Michael Arfken
2009· article· en· Theory & Psychology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
A unified framework integrating psychology and geography
Friedrich M. Götz, Daniel R. Montello, Michael E. W. Varnum, Davide Luca, Douglas T. Kenrick
2025· review· en· Nature Human Behaviour· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The Cognitive Process of Decision Making
Yingxu Wang, Guenther Ruhe
2011· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About