MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 42 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Unifying Dark Fluid Model
Alexandre Arbey
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Probing cosmology via the clustering of critical points
Junsup Shim, Christophe Pichon, D. Pogosyan, Stephen Appleby, Corentin Cadiou, Juhan Kim +2 more
2024· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Lovelock–Brans–Dicke gravity
2016· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Chaotic inflationary universe in Rastall gravity
Priyanka Mandal, Bikash Chandra Paul
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
THE ENERGY OF 5D SOLITONS
W. N. Sajko, Paul S. Wesson
2001· article· en· Modern Physics Letters A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Simulation of optical interstellar scintillation
Farhang Habibi, M. Moniez, R. Ansari, S. Rahvar
2013· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Warm inflation with Barrow holographic dark energy
Moli Ghosh, Prabir Rudra, Surajit Chattopadhyay, Behnam Pourhassan
2025· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The dynamics of spatially confined oscillations
Till Stadtler, Pavel Kroupa, Manfred Schmid
2020· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Dark matter or strong gravity?
Saurya Das, Sourav Sur
2022· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About