MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,175 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,175 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 43 of 44

Labels cover 6 of 2,175 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,175 of 2,175 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
3.3 Lloyd Gaines
2015· article· Blue Tiger Commons (Lincoln University - Missouri)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Judicial Ethics
2021· article· en· eYLS (Yale Law School)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The condition of India (cont.): lawyers
Mohandas Gandhi
2011· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The conditions of India (cont.): doctors
Mohandas Gandhi
2011· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Celebrating Osgoode Research
2014· article· en· eYLS (Yale Law School)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Moot Court
2015· article· en· The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
New footprints on an old trail
Michael Saini
2025· article· en· Family Court Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Realizing Moral Purpose
Michael Fullan
2012· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About