MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

872 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
872 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 18

Labels cover 1 of 872 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 872 of 872 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A Dirac Operator for Extrinsic Shape Analysis
Hsueh‐Ti Derek Liu, Alec Jacobson, Keenan Crane
2017· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
MGCN
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Decomposing cloth
Eddy Boxerman, Uri M. Ascher
2004· article· en· Computer animation and simulation· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
fundno affunlabeled
SHED
Yanir Kleiman, Oliver van Kaick, Olga Sorkine‐Hornung, Daniel Cohen‐Or
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Eulerian-on-lagrangian cloth simulation
Nicholas J. Weidner, Kyle Piddington, David I. W. Levin, Shinjiro Sueda
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Spectral coarsening of geometric operators
Hsueh‐Ti Derek Liu, Alec Jacobson, Maks Ovsjanikov
2019· article· en· King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
The human touch
Dinesh K. Pai, Austin Rothwell, Pearson A. Wyder-Hodge, Alistair Wick, Ye Fan, Egor Larionov +3 more
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Surface2Volume
Chrystiano Araújo, Daniela Cabiddu, Marco Attene, Marco Livesu, Nicholas Vining, Alla Sheffer
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Example-guided anthropometric human body modeling
Yuzhe Zhang, Jianmin Zheng, Nadia Magnenat‐Thalmann
2014· article· en· The Visual Computer· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Dihedral angle-based maps of tetrahedral meshes
Gilles-Philippe Paillé, Nicolas Ray, Pierre Poulin, Alla Sheffer, Bruno Lévy
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Stroke Parameterization
Ryan Schmidt
2013· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Learning 3D mesh segmentation and labeling
Evangelos Kalogerakis, Aaron Hertzmann, Karan Singh
2010· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fast Complementary Dynamics via Skinning Eigenmodes
Otman Benchekroun, Jiayi Eris Zhang, Siddartha Chaudhuri, Eitan Grinspun, Yi Zhou, Alec Jacobson
2023· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Learning shape placements by example
Paul Guerrero, Stefan Jeschke, Michael Wimmer, Peter Wonka
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Cone carving for surface reconstruction
Shy Shalom, Ariel Shamir, Hao Zhang, Daniel Cohen‐Or
2010· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About