MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Mathematical Identities
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

609 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
609 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 13

Labels cover 1 of 609 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 609 of 609 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Congruences like Atkin’s for the partition function
Scott Ahlgren, Patrick B. Allen, Shiang Tang
2022· article· lv· Transactions of the American Mathematical Society Series B· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
On Chudnovsky–Ramanujan type formulae
Imin Chen, Gleb Glebov
2017· article· en· The Ramanujan Journal· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
A note on the identities of special polynomials
Taekyun Kim, Dmitry V. Dolgy, Dae San Kim, Seog Hoon Rim
2014· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Elliptic integral representation of Bessel moments
David H. Bailey, Jonathan M. Borwein, David Broadhurst, M. L. Glasser
2008· article· en· NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Generalised Bernoulli polynomials and series
Clément Frappier
2000· article· en· Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Identities for the Ramanujan zeta function
Mathew D. Rogers
2013· article· en· Advances in Applied Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A Generalization of Two q-Identities of Andrews
Kuo-Jye Chen, H. M. Srivastava
2001· article· en· Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
On the Infinitude of Composite NSW Numbers
James A. Sellers, Hugh C. Williams
2002· article· en· ˜The œFibonacci quarterly· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Generating weighted Hurwitz numbers
2020· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On a sequence of sparse binomial-type polynomials
Jason I. Brown, Karl Dilcher, Dante Manna
2012· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Binding number and tenacity
Michael Yatauro
2014· article· en· Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sums of products of generalized Ramanujan sums
Soichi Ikeda, Isao Kiuchi, Kaneaki Matsuoka
2016· article· en· Journal of integer sequences· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Multiple zeta star values on 3–2–1 indices
Kh. Hessami Pilehrood, Tatiana Hessami Pilehrood
2022· article· en· The Ramanujan Journal· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Product partitions and recursion formulae
M. Venkata Subbarao
2004· article· en· International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About