MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

990 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
990 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 20

Labels cover 0 of 990 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 990 of 990 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Reported Speech and viewpoint hierarchy
Barbara Dancygier
2019· article· en· Linguistic Typology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Are clefts contagious in conversation?
Andreea S. Calude, Steven P. Miller
2009· article· en· English Language and Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Repair in membership categorization in French
Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, Andrea Golato
2008· article· en· Language in Society· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Projecting nonalignment in conversation
Anna Lindström
2009· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Thanking responders in Cameroon English
Yves Talla Sando Ouafeu
2009· article· en· World Englishes· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Repetition in the initiation of repair
Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu
2009· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
The Acquisition of Evidentiality
Stanka A. Fitneva
2018· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
Responding to self-criticism in psychotherapy
Peter Muntigl, Adam O. Horvath, Eva Bänninger-Huber, Lynne Angus
2019· article· en· Psychotherapy Research· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Givenness
Michael Rochemont
2015· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Critical Engagements with Culture and Self
Sunil Bhatia, Henderikus J. Stam
2005· article· en· Theory & Psychology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About