MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,034 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,034 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 41

Labels cover 13 of 2,034 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,034 of 2,034 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
What's the big deal about big data?
F'IEEE Nick Cercone
2015· article· en· Big Data and Information Analytics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Reproducibility in Subsurface Geoscience
Michael Steventon, Christopher Jackson, Matt G. Hall, Mark Ireland, Marcus R. Munafò, Kathryn J. Roberts
2022· article· en· Earth Science Systems and Society· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
An Actor-Based Middleware for Crowd-Sourced Services
Ahmed Abdel Moamen, Nadeem Jamali
2017· article· en· ICST Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Moving Text Analysis Tools to the Cloud
Himanshu Vashishtha, Michael Smit, Eleni Stroulia
2010· article· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Chapter 2.2 Status and Trends –Nature
2019· report· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs)
Jonathan Tennant, Natalia Bielczyk, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Paola Masuzzo, Tobias Steiner
2020· article· en· KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reproducibility as a service
Joseph Wonsil, Nichole Boufford, Prakhar Agrawal, Christopher S. Chen, Tianhang Cui, Akash Sivaram +1 more
2023· article· en· Software Practice and Experience· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
What Do We (Not) Know About Research Software Engineering?
Anna‐Lena Lamprecht, Carlos Martínez-Ortiz, Michelle Barker, Sadie L. Bartholomew, Justin Barton, Neil Chue Hong +10 more
2022· article· en· Journal of Open Research Software· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Toward Open-source Epidemiology
Neal D. Goldstein
2017· editorial· en· Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Rise of Industrial AI in America
Kristina McElheran, Mu-Jeung Yang, Erik Brynjolfsson, Zachary Kroff
2025· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Towards an e-infrastructure for Open Science in Soils Security
Sérgio Manuel Serra da Cruz, Marcos Bacis Ceddia, Éber Assis Schmitz, Gabriel S. Rizzo, Rosa Victoria Valderrama Miranda, Sabrina O. Cruz +4 more
2018· article· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Managing Distributed MARF's Nodes with SNMP.
Serguei A. Mokhov, Lee Wei Huynh, Jian Li
2008· article· en· Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The space-for-time gambit fails a robust test
Amy L. Angert
2024· article· en· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
The launch of Seismica: a seismic shift in publishing
C. D. Rowe, Matthew Agius, J. A. Convers, G. J. Funning, Carmine Galasso, Stephen Hicks +9 more
2022· article· en· Seismica· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About