MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

723 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
723 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 15

Labels cover 71 of 723 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 723 of 723 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Peer Review As Boundary Work
Graham Howard
2012· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+stsconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Return of the Armchair Scholar
Sandra Roff
2005· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearchgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Burn This Article: An Inflammatory View of Peer Review
Trevor Davis Lipscombe
2016· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books: 2009–2011
Albert N. Greco, Robert M. Wharton, Falguni Sen
2012· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Launching a New Academic Journal: Twenty Years Later
Charles C. Fischer
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Death of a Small Journal?
Stephen K. Donovan
2013· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers
S. K Donovan
2007· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Twilight of Digitization Is Now
Thomas Hecker
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Commensality of Book Reviewing
Ronald W. Tobin
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?
Michael C. Jensen
2007· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Fair Use: A Double-Edged Sword
Sanford G. Thatcher
2000· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
What Good is Copyright?
Peter Givler
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
4
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About