MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Photonic and Optical Devices
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,775 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,775 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 57 of 76

Labels cover 8 of 3,775 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,775 of 3,775 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Hadamard spectrometer for passive LWIR standoff surveillance
Roman V. Kruzelecky, Brian J. F. Wong, Jing Zou, Najeeb Mohammad, Wes Jamroz, M. Soltani +4 more
2007· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Low group velocity devices in silicon photonics
Daniel Pergande, Andreas von Rhein, T. Geppert, Cécile Jamois, Ralf B. Wehrspohn, Jan Huebner +1 more
2006· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Design of an electro-optic-polymer-based Mach-Zehnder modulator
C.J. Haugen, R. G. DeCorby, James N. McMullin, Cibby Pulikkaseril
2000· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
From polarization multipoles to higher-order coherences
Aaron Z. Goldberg, A. B. Klimov, Hubert de Guise, Gerd Leuchs, G. S. Agarwal, L. L. Sánchez-Soto
2021· preprint· en· Optics Letters· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Ultra-broadband and Low-loss 16 × 16 SiPh Switch
Alok Das, Guowu Zhang, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur
2021· article· en· Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Towards 2 - 14µm Silicon Photonics
Graham T. Reed, Miloš Nedeljković, Jordi Soler Penadés, Vinita Mittal, Ganapathy Senthil Murugan, Ali Z. Khokhar +14 more
2016· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Silicon nitride integrated optics
Jonathan D. B. Bradley, Renjie Wang, Henry C. Frankis, Dawson B. Bonneville, Khadijeh Miarabbas Kiani, Hamidu M. Mbonde
2020· book-chapter· en· Institution of Engineering and Technology eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About