MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,449 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,449 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 29

Labels cover 12 of 1,449 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,449 of 1,449 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The case for virtuous robots
Martin Gibert
2022· article· en· AI and Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Prediction as extraction of discretion
Sun‐ha Hong
2023· article· en· Big Data & Society· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Legal Priorities Research: A Research Agenda
Christoph Winter, Jonas Schuett, Eric Martínez, Suzanne Van Arsdale, Renan Araújo, Nick Hollman +4 more
2021· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
13
citations
affunlabeled
“It would be pretty immoral to choose a random algorithm”
Helena Webb, Menisha Patel, Michael Rovatsos, Alan Davoust, Sofia Ceppi, Ansgar Koene +4 more
2019· article· en· Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithmic Harms and Algorithmic Wrongs
Nathalie Diberardino, Clair Baleshta, Luke Stark
2024· article· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Strategic Games and Algorithmic Secrecy
Ignacio Cofone, Katherine J. Strandburg
2020· article· en· McGill Law Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundgemma · stsgpt · stsmodels split
Who are the publics engaging in AI?
Renée Sieber, Ana Brandusescu, Abigail Adu-Daako, Suthee Sangiambut
2024· review· en· Public Understanding of Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+scholarly_communicationconsensus · sts
13
citations
affunlabeled
A posthumanist approach to AI literacy
Zhaozhe Wang, Chaoran Wang
2025· article· en· Computers & composition/Computers and composition· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Subjectivity and information ethics1
Bernd Frohmann
2007· article· en· Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
12
citations
affunlabeled
AI and Disaster Risk: A Practitioner Perspective
Aparna Moitra, Dennis Wagenaar, Manveer Kalirai, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Robert Soden
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
12
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Human Where?
Marc A. Anderson, Karën Fort
2022· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Fairness guarantee in multi-class classification
Christophe Denis, Romuald Élie, Mohamed Hebiri, François Hu
2021· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Data science meets law
Shlomi Hod, Karni Chagal-Feferkorn, Niva Elkin-Koren, Avigdor Gal
2022· article· en· Communications of the ACM· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+open_scienceconsensus · sts+open_science
11
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Machine Learning and the Future of Realism
Giles Hooker, Cliff Hooker
2018· article· en· Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
11
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About