MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

920 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
920 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 19

Labels cover 20 of 920 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 920 of 920 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Our Friends Are Killing Us
Lorraine Busby
2011· article· en· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
A Tale of Two Serials Cancellations
Mike Olson, David Killian, Debbie Bezanson, Robin Kinder
2017· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A Necessity: Outsourcing the Issues of Print Serials
Heather D’Amour, Ada-Marie Nechka, Gloria Dingwall, Umashanie Reddy
2012· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
SPEC Kit 353: Funding Article Processing Charges (November 2016)
Gail McMillan, Leslie O’Brien, Philip J. Young
2016· book· en· SPEC Kit - Association of Research Libraries. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center/Kit - Association of Research Libraries. Systems and Procedures Exchange Center· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Adventures in Reprint Rights
Maggie Hivnor
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Information: People still count
2018· article· en· Documentation et bibliothèques· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affgemma · bibliometricsgpt · bibliometricsmodels agree
A bibliometric analysis of Serials Review from 1991 to 2020
2021· article· en· San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Out of the Stack and into the Net
Gaynor Austen, Carolyn D. Young
2005· article· en· The Reference Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Exploring Perceptions of E-Books Among CEGEP Students and Faculty
Yuan Chen, Saul Carliner, Salvador García Martínez, Ann-Louise Davidson
2019· article· en· Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Documenting electronic heterogenous literature
Lescouet Emmanuelle, Marcello Vitali-Rosati
2022· article· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Implications of Electronic Journals for Information Institutions
Abdus Sattar Chaudry, Zhihong Wang
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
“Shelf-Ready” Print Serials Acquisitions
José Luis Andrade, Heather D’Amour, Gloria Dingwall, Julie Su, Sharon Dyas-Correia
2011· article· en· Serials Review· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Toward information equity among academic libraries
Chad Currier
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Keeping Pace with OpenURL
Carol H. Wu
2004· article· en· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Moving From Paper to E-Book Reading
Joan Vinall-Cox
2012· article· en· eLearn· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Wiley (John) & Sons Inc.
2007· article· en· Mergent s Dividend Achievers· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About