MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian review of comparative literature
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

446 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
446 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 9

Labels cover 0 of 446 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 446 of 446 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Legacies of Theory: Introduction
Mássimo Verdicchio
2011· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
A Literary Historian
Rod Stratford
2011· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Book Reviews II
Lorraine Markotić, Marlene A. Briggs, Jason Gleckman, Susan Ingram, Sarah Jefferies
2009· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
(Post-)Magical Realism in Global Cinema
Iván H. Jiménez Williams
2023· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Can the Global Speak?
Alexander Beecroft
2024· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Flemish Literature and World Literature
Theo D’haen
2023· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Globalization as a Trope
Susanne Lüdemann
2024· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Introduction
Vid Stevanović, Claudine Bollinger
2024· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Post-Magical Realist Worlds: Introduction
Agata Mergler, Justyna Poray-Wybranowska
2022· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Polyglot Art Practices: Introduction
Doris Hambuch
2022· article· en· Canadian review of comparative literature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About