MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,158 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20102025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,158 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 44

Labels cover 2 of 2,158 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,158 of 2,158 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
Employing Co-op Employer Evaluations to Assess Outcomes
Wayne J. Parker, Rocco Fondacaro, Oscar Nespoli
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
EVOLUTION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEERING MENTORSHIP PROGRAM
Kush Bubbar, Alexandros Dimopolous, Roslyn Gaetz, Peter Wild, Michael McWilliam
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affvenueunlabeled
ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM WORK ATTRIBUTE
Genevieve Hoffart, Katherine Gibbard, Tom O’Neill, Anders Nygren, William Rosehart
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
IMPLEMENTING EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION ON ENGINEERING AND SOCIETY
Matthew Harsh, Brandiff Caron, Deborah Dysart‐Gale, Govind Gopakumar, Ketra Schmitt
2015· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
A FORMAL DESIGN SCIENCE
Yong Zeng
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affvenueunlabeled
What Makes a Good Assessment? Assessments for Learning
Michael Stachowsky, Andrew Milne
2018· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
GENDERED PATTERNS IN SENIOR ENGINEERS’ LEADERSHIP LEARNING
Emily Macdonald-Roach, Cindy Rottmann, Andrea Chan, Emily Moore
2020· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A PEER REVIEWED ONLINE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING FRAMEWORK
Pieter J. Mosterman, Don Bouldin, Andrzej Ruciński
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
EFFECTIVELY ASSESSING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SKILLS
David S. Strong, Sue Fostaty Young
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Experiences of Women in Undergraduate Engineering
Natalie Mazur, Bronwyn Chorlton, John Gales
2018· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
THE SEMANTICS OF SUSTAINABILITY
Julia Bourke
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
CEAB’s Graduate Attributes and Ontario’s UUDLEs
Warren Stiver
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About