MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 82

Labels cover 359 of 4,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,076 of 4,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research
Richard G. Jung, Pietro Di Santo, Cole Clifford, Graeme Prosperi‐Porta, Stephanie Skanes, Annie Hung +5 more
2021· review· en· Nature Communications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
188
citations
affunlabeled
PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility
Alison Booth, Mike Clarke, Gordon Dooley, Davina Ghersi, David Moher, Mark Petticrew +1 more
2013· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
187
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Posing the research question: not so simple
Lehana Thabane, Tara Thomas, Chenglin Ye, James Paul
2008· review· en· Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
182
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Determination of the clinical importance of study results
Malcolm Man‐Son‐Hing, Andreas Laupacis, Keith O’Rourke, Frank Molnar, Jeffery Mahon, Karen B Y Chan +1 more
2002· review· en· Journal of General Internal Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
179
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study
Susan Armijo‐Olivo, Bruno R. da Costa, Greta G. Cummings, Christine Ha, Jorge Fuentes, Humam Saltaji +1 more
2015· review· en· PLoS ONE· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
173
citations
afffundunlabeled
A consensus-based transparency checklist
Balázs Aczél, Barnabás Szászi, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Zoltán Kekecs, Šimon Kucharský, Daniel J. Benjamin +61 more
2019· article· en· Nature Human Behaviour· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
172
citations
affunlabeled
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review
Lesley Uttley, Daniel Quintana, Paul Montgomery, Christopher Carroll, Matthew J. Page, Louise Falzon +2 more
2023· review· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
169
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians
Víctor M. Montori, Marek Smieja, Gordon H. Guyatt
2000· review· en· Mayo Clinic Proceedings· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
168
citations
afffundunlabeled
Blinding in Physical Therapy Trials and Its Association with Treatment Effects
Susan Armijo‐Olivo, Jorge Fuentes, Bruno R. da Costa, Humam Saltaji, Christine Ha, Greta G. Cummings
2016· review· en· American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
162
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
The Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Richard Buckley, Ross Leighton, Kelly Trask
2011· article· en· Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Registration of observational studies: Is it time?
R. J. Williams, Tony Tse, W. R. Harlan, Deborah A. Zarin
2010· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
159
citations
affunlabeled
Pravila PRISMA 2020.
Matthew J. Page, Jeremy Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth Loder +20 more
2021· article· hr· Medicina Fluminensis· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
158
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About