MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

699 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
699 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 14

Labels cover 2 of 699 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 699 of 699 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Meissner effect in Fock space
J. Mumford
2022· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quantum-classical dynamical brackets
2021· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Subspace controllability of symmetric spin networks
Jiahui Chen, Yehao Zhou, Ji Bian, Jun Li, Xinhua Peng
2020· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fourth-order series expansion of the exchange hole
Rodrigo Wang, Yongxi Zhou, Matthias Ernzerhof
2017· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Terahertz control of air lasing
Matteo Clerici, Andrew Bruhács, Daniele Faccio, Marco Peccianti, M. Spanner, Andrey Markov +5 more
2019· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Generalizing entanglement
Ding Jia
2017· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Extreme electrodynamics in time-varying media
M. A. Vincenti, Domenico de Ceglia, N. Aközbek, Marcello Ferrera, Carlo Rizza, Andrea Alù +3 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Multipoles from Majorana constellations
J. L. Romero, A. B. Klimov, Aaron Z. Goldberg, Gerd Leuchs, L. L. Sánchez-Soto
2024· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fluctuations of subsystem entropies at late times
Jordan Cotler, Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Daniel Ranard
2022· preprint· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Intense VUV–xenon-cluster interaction revisited
Rishi Pandit, Nicolas Bigaouette, Valerie R. Becker, Jeremy Thurston, Kasey Barrington, Edward Ackad +1 more
2019· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About