MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

864 results · 1 filter active ·
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
864 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 18

Labels cover 133 of 864 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 864 of 864 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
Understanding Academic Misconduct
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Higher Education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
202
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integritymodels split
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
2014· review· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
132
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Academic Integrity in Canada
2022· book· en· Ethics and integrity in educational contexts· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · research_integrity
81
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retractions in orthopaedic research
2016· article· en· Bone and Joint Research· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Using Learning Analytics for Preserving Academic Integrity
2017· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
61
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review
2017· review· en· World Neurosurgery· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · none
53
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Salami-slicing and plagiarism: How should we respond?
2019· editorial· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
50
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About