MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,961 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,961 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 40

Labels cover 2 of 1,961 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,961 of 1,961 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The many faces of configural processing
Daphne Maurer, Richard Le Grand, Catherine J. Mondloch
2002· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2,124
citations
affunlabeled
The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy
David J. Kelly, Paul C. Quinn, Alan Slater, Kang Lee, Liezhong Ge, Olivier Pascalis
2007· article· en· Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
747
citations
affunlabeled
Transmitting and Decoding Facial Expressions
Marie L. Smith, Garrison W. Cottrell, FrédéAric Gosselin, Philippe G. Schyns
2005· article· en· Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
735
citations
affunlabeled
Deciphering the Enigmatic Face
Zara Ambadar, Jonathan W. Schooler, Jeffrey F. Cohn
2005· article· en· Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
648
citations
affunlabeled
Angry, Disgusted, or Afraid?
Hillel Aviezer, Ran R. Hassin, Jennifer D. Ryan, Cheryl L. Grady, Josh Susskind, Adam K. Anderson +2 more
2008· article· en· Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
645
citations
afffundunlabeled
Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces
Caroline Blais, Rachael E. Jack, Christoph Scheepers, Daniel Fiset, Roberto Caldara
2008· article· en· PLoS ONE· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
631
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition
Joshua M. Susskind, Daniel H. Lee, Andrée M. Cusi, Roman Feiman, Wojtek Grabski, Adam K. Anderson
2008· article· en· Nature Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
585
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Early visual experience and face processing
Richard Le Grand, Catherine J. Mondloch, Daphne Maurer, Henry P. Brent
2001· article· en· Nature· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
583
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The impact of social context on mimicry
Patrick L. Bourgeois, Ursula Heß
2007· article· en· Biological Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
466
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it
Jelena Ristic, Chris Kelland Friesen, Alan Kingstone
2002· article· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
427
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces
Günter Löffler, Grigori Yourganov, Frances Wilkinson, Hugh R. Wilson
2005· article· en· Nature Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
354
citations
afffundunlabeled
Early Face Processing Specificity: It's in the Eyes!
Roxane J. Itier, Claude Alain, Katherine Sedore, Anthony R. McIntosh
2007· article· en· Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
279
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Developmental changes in face processing skills
Catherine J. Mondloch, Sybil Geldart, Daphne Maurer, Richard Le Grand
2003· article· en· Journal of Experimental Child Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
273
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About