MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

465 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
465 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 10

Labels cover 3 of 465 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 465 of 465 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Kalervo Järvelin, Jaana Kekäläinen
2002· article· en· ACM Transactions on Information Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4,634
citations
afffundunlabeled
Anserini
Peilin Yang, Hui Fang, Jimmy Lin
2017· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
323
citations
afffundunlabeled
Anserini
Peilin Yang, Hui Fang, Jimmy Lin
2018· article· en· Journal of Data and Information Quality· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
230
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Research Methods: Triangulation
Virginia Wilson
2014· article· en· Evidence Based Library and Information Practice· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
136
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Information Retrieval
Tieyun Qian, Yiqun Liu, Tong Ruan, Jian‐Yun Nie, Ji-Rong Wen
2017· book· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
127
citations
affunlabeled
BoltzRank
Maksims Volkovs, Richard S. Zemel
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Deciphering mobile search patterns
Jeonghee Yi, Farzin Maghoul, Jan Pedersen
2008· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Information Retrieval
Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne
2014· book-chapter· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Overview of the TREC 2009 Web Track
Charles L. A. Clarke, Nick Craswell, Ellen M. Voorhees
2009· article· en· Text REtrieval Conference· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
94
citations
affunlabeled
Ranking via Sinkhorn Propagation
Ryan P. Adams, Richard S. Zemel
2011· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery
Douglas W. Oard, Jason R. Baron, Bruce Hedin, David Lewis, Stephen Tomlinson
2010· article· en· Artificial Intelligence and Law· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
affunlabeled
CRTER
Jiashu Zhao, Jimmy Xiangji Huang, Ben He
2011· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
Indexing time vs. query time
Stefan Büttcher, Charles L. A. Clarke
2005· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
63
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Query Expansion with Long-Span Collocates
Olga Vechtomova, Stephen Robertson, Susan Jones
2003· article· en· Information Retrieval· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
World Wide Web navigation aid
Milena Head, Norm Archer, Yufei Yuan
2000· article· en· International Journal of Human-Computer Studies· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About