MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

444 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
444 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 9

Labels cover 2 of 444 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 444 of 444 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
National Intellectual Capital Index
Nick Bontis
2004· article· en· Journal of Intellectual Capital· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
545
citations
affunlabeled
Intellectual capital in Serbia’s hotel industry
Nick Bontis, Stevo Janošević, Vladimir Dženopoljac
2015· article· en· International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
209
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Intangible assets : values, measures, and risks
John R. M. Hand, Baruch Lev
2003· preprint· en· RePEc: Research Papers in Economics· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
183
citations
affunlabeled
Intangible assets and performance
Josée St‐Pierre, Josée Audet
2011· article· en· Journal of Intellectual Capital· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
120
citations
affunlabeled
Intellectual capital disclosure payback
Carla Curado, Lopes Henriques, Nick Bontis
2011· article· en· Management Decision· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
118
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Intellectual capital in Egyptian software firms
Ahmed Seleim, Ahmed Ashour, Nick Bontis
2004· article· en· The Learning Organization· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Intellectual capital accounting in the UK
Robin Roslender, Robin Fincham
2004· article· en· Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
110
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About