MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

23 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20022025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
23 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 23 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 23 of 23 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Foundations of Typestate-Oriented Programming
Ronald Garcia, Éric Tanter, Roger Wolff, Jonathan Aldrich
2014· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
affunlabeled
Practical extraction techniques for Java
Frank Tip, Peter F. Sweeney, Chris Laffra, Aldo Eisma, David Streeter
2002· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
afffundunlabeled
PolyTOIL
Kim B. Bruce, Angela Schuett, R. H. van Gent, Adrian Fiech
2003· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
55
citations
affunlabeled
Type-Driven Gradual Security with References
Matías Toro, Ronald Garcia, Éric Tanter
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Encapsulating objects with confined types
Christian Grothoff, Jens Palsberg, Jan Vítek
2007· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
afffundunlabeled
<i>Forma</i>
Peng Zhao, Shimin Cui, Yaoqing Gao, Raúl Silvera, José Nelson Amaral
2007· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth
Stephen M. Blackburn, Amer Diwan, Matthias Hauswirth, Peter F. Sweeney, José Nelson Amaral, Tim Brecht +13 more
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Obsidian
Michael Coblenz, Reed Oei, Tyler Etzel, Paulette Koronkevich, Miles Baker, Yannick Bloem +3 more
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Capturing Types
Aleksander Boruch-Gruszecki, Martin Odersky, Edward Lee
2023· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Implicit-signal monitors
Peter A. Buhr, Ashif S. Harji
2005· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Polymorphic specialization for ML
Simon Helsen, Peter Thiemann
2004· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Towards Porting Operating Systems with Program Synthesis
Jingmei Hu, Eric Lu, David A. Holland, Ming Kawaguchi, Stephen Chong, Margo Seltzer
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Two-dimensional bidirectional object layout
Joseph Gil, William Pugh, Grant Weddell, Yoav Zibin
2008· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Focusing on Refinement Typing
Dimitrios J. Economou, Neel Krishnaswami, Jana Dunfield
2023· article· en· ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About