MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
American Journal of Evaluation
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

60 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
60 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 1 of 60 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 60 of 60 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives
2008· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · metaresearch+bibliometrics
144
citations
affaboutunlabeled
A New Realistic Evaluation Analysis Method
2012· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
144
citations
affgpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · no categorymodels split
Talking Circles: A Culturally Responsive Evaluation Practice
2020· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch
64
citations
affunlabeled
Introducing Reflexivity to Evaluation Practice
2016· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch
34
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating Social Innovations
2018· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
Analysis of Thin Online Interview Data
2007· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Making Space for Adaptive Learning
2018· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Planning for community-based evaluation
2000· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Planning for Community-based Evaluation
2000· article· en· American Journal of Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
9
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About