MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

49 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
49 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 49 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 49 of 49 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
On Writing Labour Law History: A Reconnaissance
Eric Tucker
2017· article· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Employers’ Liability for Bullying and Harassment
Eoin Quill
2005· article· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Introduction
Adelle Blackett
2018· article· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Guest Editorial
Niklas Bruun
2014· editorial· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editorial
Olga Rymkevich
2010· editorial· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editorial
Marlene Schmidt, Olga Rymkevich
2004· editorial· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editorial
Marlene Schmidt, Olga Rymkevich
2009· editorial· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Union Exclusivity Arrangements: A Comparative Overview
Kenneth J. Miller
2000· article· en· International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations· Business, Management and Accounting
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About