MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

42 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20152025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
42 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 42 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 42 of 42 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Engaging the senses
2018· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Arts and Humanities
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Stress perception
2015· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Psychology
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reactions to second language speech
2020· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Psychology
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Listening to learners’ voices
2016· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Technology and second language pronunciation
2018· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Psychology
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
I hear you, I see you, I know who you are
2022· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Hul’q’umi’num’ listening quizzes
2025· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Psychology
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Age still matters after early adulthood
2025· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Psychology
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Teaching perspectives
2025· article· en· Journal of Second Language Pronunciation· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About