MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Winter Simulation Conference
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

231 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002018
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
231 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 5

Labels cover 0 of 231 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 231 of 231 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Simulation in java with SSJ
Pierre L’Ecuyer, Éric Buist
2005· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
affunlabeled
Splitting for rare-event simulation
Pierre L’Ecuyer, Valérie Demers, Bruno Tuffin
2006· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
affunlabeled
Modeling and simulation of call centers
Athanassios N. Avramidis, Pierre L’Ecuyer
2005· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
affunlabeled
Modelling and simulation of a telephone call center
Juta Pichitlamken, Alexandre Deslauriers, Pierre L’Ecuyer, Athanassios N. Avramidis
2003· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
Simulation of modular building construction
Osama Mohsen, Paul J. Knytl, Basel Abdulaal, Jacek Olearczyk, Mohamed Al‐Hussein
2008· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Approximate zero-variance simulation
Pierre L’Ecuyer, Bruno Tuffin
2008· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Panel on grand challenges for modeling and simulation
Simon J. E. Taylor, Richard Fujimoto, Ernest H. Page, Paul A. Fishwick, Adelinde M. Uhrmacher, Gabriel Wainer
2012· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
Simulation within the railroad environment
H. Kruêger, Eric Vaillancourt, Ann M. Drummie, Steve J. Vucko, Joe Bekavac
2000· article· en· Winter Simulation Conference· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About