Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sex, Religion, Media. Dane S. Claussen. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. 295 pp. $72.50 hbk. $24.95 pbk. The study of religion and media has taken on new legitimacy and life over the past decade with a spate of new books and journals. Although The Religious Communication Association launched The Journal of Communication and Religion as early as 1978, serious inquiries into this long-neglected field were few until the early 1990s. Pioneers in the academic exploration of religion, media, and popular culture include Judith Buddenbaum and Daniel Stout, who have published books on the topic together and separately, and who started the Journal of Media and Religion in 2002; Stewart M. Hoover, founding chair of the International Study Commission on Media, Religion, and Culture and author of Religion in the News: Faith and Journalism in American Public Discourse; and Mark Silk, author of Unsecular Media: Making News of Religion in America. Important studies have also been published by Lynn Schofield Clark, Knut Lundby, Quentin J. Schultze, and many others. Sex, Religion, Media is a welcome work of religion and media scholarship that features nineteen chapters focusing on the intersection of these three subjects. The book covers a valuable segment of the ever-widening scope of media and religion titles. Sex comes first in this title and is the thread that ties the book's widely varied research together. This unique and eclectic anthology, edited by Dane S. Claussen, associate professor in the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication at Point Park College in Pittsburgh, offers studies that range from filmic depictions of religious and sexual images, to New Right responses to sexual media, to gay and lesbian religious controversies. Some of the works in this collection are more scholarly than others, and some are more objective than others, but all are thought provoking and useful. The approaches are as varied as the topics, from qualitative historical narratives to quantitative analyses. One study, Family, Peers, Religiosity, Electronic Media, and the Risk of Adolescent Sexual Activity, found that all four factors have varying influences on an adolescent's decision whether or not to have premarital sex based on a survey of 467 respondents. Two very timely essays discuss media approaches to coverage of child molestation by the clergy. One piece focuses on American and Canadian news coverage of Catholic priests charged with pedophilia. News stories of molestation were often delayed in the secular press for years, we are told, as many editors did not want to tangle with ecclesiastical authorities. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».