CIRG/TORI 010: 10-Month Analysis of a Randomized Phase II Trial of Motesanib Plus Weekly Paclitaxel as First Line Therapy in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: We assessed, in a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, the effect of adding motesanib (M), a small molecule antagonist of VEGF, PDGF and Kit receptors, to paclitaxel (P) as first line treatment of subjects with MBC. A P plus bevacizumab (B) open-label arm was included. The study was supported by Amgen Inc.Methods: 282 subjects with HER2-negative and measurable MBC were randomly assigned treatment with P 90mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in combination with blinded placebo (Arm A), blinded M 125mg once daily (Arm B) or open-label B 10mg/kg on days 1 and 15 (Arm C). Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity or consent withdrawal. The primary objective was to compare objective response rate (ORR: CR or PR) between Arm A and B. Treatment efficacy was assessed every 8 weeks according to RECIST version 1.0 and scans were centrally reviewed.Results: 277 subjects received study treatment. Subject characteristics at entry were balanced: median age was 55, 80% had hormone receptor positive tumors and 66% had received adjuvant chemotherapy. At this analysis, 10 months after last enrolled subject, 235 subjects had completed treatment (median duration: 6 cycles). The median cumulative dose of P was similar across the arms: 1530, 1455 and 1652 mg/m2 in Arms A, B and C, respectively. Subjects received a median cumulative dose of 179 mg/kg of B (Arm C) and a median daily dose of 111 mg of M (Arm B). The table displays the efficacy results and relevant differences in toxicity incidences:More adverse events were reported in Arm B compared to the other arms, mainly grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicities, hepatobiliary toxicities and hypertension. Infections and stomatitis were more frequently reported in Arm C. Venous thrombo-embolic events were similar across all three arms. Among serious hepatobiliary disorders, 5 subjects experienced serious cholecystitis or gallbladder enlargement: 4 of them were managed by surgery and 4 subjects could resume study treatment.The ORR favored Arms B and C as compared to Arm A, with 49%, 52% and 41% respectively but the difference between Arm A and B was not statistically significant (p=.31, adjusting for stratification factors). Stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks was reported for 34%, 36% and 33% of subject in Arms A, B and C respectively. The Progression-Free Survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the three arms.Conclusion: The antitumor effect of P and M is comparable to P and B as treatment of subjects with HER2-negative MBC but P and M increases toxicities compared to the other arms. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 47.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».