CIRG/TORI 010: 10-Month Analysis of a Randomized Phase II Trial of Motesanib Plus Weekly Paclitaxel as First Line Therapy in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: We assessed, in a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, the effect of adding motesanib (M), a small molecule antagonist of VEGF, PDGF and Kit receptors, to paclitaxel (P) as first line treatment of subjects with MBC. A P plus bevacizumab (B) open-label arm was included. The study was supported by Amgen Inc.Methods: 282 subjects with HER2-negative and measurable MBC were randomly assigned treatment with P 90mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in combination with blinded placebo (Arm A), blinded M 125mg once daily (Arm B) or open-label B 10mg/kg on days 1 and 15 (Arm C). Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity or consent withdrawal. The primary objective was to compare objective response rate (ORR: CR or PR) between Arm A and B. Treatment efficacy was assessed every 8 weeks according to RECIST version 1.0 and scans were centrally reviewed.Results: 277 subjects received study treatment. Subject characteristics at entry were balanced: median age was 55, 80% had hormone receptor positive tumors and 66% had received adjuvant chemotherapy. At this analysis, 10 months after last enrolled subject, 235 subjects had completed treatment (median duration: 6 cycles). The median cumulative dose of P was similar across the arms: 1530, 1455 and 1652 mg/m2 in Arms A, B and C, respectively. Subjects received a median cumulative dose of 179 mg/kg of B (Arm C) and a median daily dose of 111 mg of M (Arm B). The table displays the efficacy results and relevant differences in toxicity incidences:More adverse events were reported in Arm B compared to the other arms, mainly grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicities, hepatobiliary toxicities and hypertension. Infections and stomatitis were more frequently reported in Arm C. Venous thrombo-embolic events were similar across all three arms. Among serious hepatobiliary disorders, 5 subjects experienced serious cholecystitis or gallbladder enlargement: 4 of them were managed by surgery and 4 subjects could resume study treatment.The ORR favored Arms B and C as compared to Arm A, with 49%, 52% and 41% respectively but the difference between Arm A and B was not statistically significant (p=.31, adjusting for stratification factors). Stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks was reported for 34%, 36% and 33% of subject in Arms A, B and C respectively. The Progression-Free Survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the three arms.Conclusion: The antitumor effect of P and M is comparable to P and B as treatment of subjects with HER2-negative MBC but P and M increases toxicities compared to the other arms. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 47.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".