MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2055426083 · doi:10.1002/pbc.21937

Hits and misses in targeting pediatric cancers

2009· letter· en· W2055426083 sur OpenAlexaff
Mark L. Bernstein

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2009
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGiSTMedicineImatinibInterstitial cell of CajalImatinib mesylatePlatelet-derived growth factor receptorOncologyInternal medicineTyrosine kinaseTyrosine-kinase inhibitorChemotherapyStromal tumorStromal cellCancer researchCancerImmunohistochemistryGrowth factorReceptor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms of the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), first described in the early 1980s 1. Gain-of-function mutations of c-KIT as a cause of these tumors were first postulated based on the converse: loss-of-function mutations caused depletion of ICCs in mouse models. The linkage between c-KIT mutation and GIST was definitively demonstrated subsequently in human tumors 2. About 85% of GISTs in adults have c-KIT mutations. A further 5–10% of adult GIST have gain-of-function mutations in platelet-derived-growth-factor (PDGF)-alpha 2. At around the same time these mutations were being described, imatinib, an inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT and PDGF-alpha was being developed by a team at Novartis. Pre-clinical testing demonstrated the activity of imatinib against GIST cell lines and a primary GIST culture from a surgical resection specimen 3. GISTs are poorly responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Prior to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, only surgery was effective in their treatment. It was therefore reasonable to test the effectiveness of imatinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST. The results of a randomized phase II study comparing two dose levels of imatinib showed good activity with little difference between the study arms, with median time to progression of 24 months, and median duration of survival of 57 months 4. Similar results were reported by the same group in a larger phase III study: median progression-free survival 18 months, median overall survival 55 months 5. The best results were in patients whose tumors harbored c-KIT exon 11 mutations (median survival 63 months), a finding confirmed by the same group in a correlative study of kinase genotype and clinical outcome 6. A small group of 13 patients had tumors which were histologically GISTs, but c-KIT-negative. While those patients responded to initial therapy with imatinib, they had significantly shorter overall survival than did patients whose tumors were c-KIT-positive (31 vs. 53 months, P = 0.02) 4. Patients whose tumors expressed wild-type c-KIT had an inferior outcome when compared with those whose tumors had an exon 11 c-KIT mutant protein 6. Pediatric patients have GISTs which express non-mutated (wild-type) c-KIT 7. The study by Janeway et al. reported in this issue includes a small series of pediatric patients and demonstrates that pediatric patients have short-lived responses to imatinib, and generally longer responses to the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib 8. Adult GIST patients with wild-type c-KIT similarly have relatively favorable responses to sunitinib 9. The responses to imatinib reported in GIST are shorter lived than in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib results in 97% complete hematologic response in patients with chronic phase CML and complete cytogenetic response in 82% (reviewed 10). Estimated 5-year progression free survival is 84%, estimated 5-year survival without progression to accelerated or blast phase is 93%, and 95% of patients survive 5 years, if deaths unrelated to CML are excluded 10. Life expectancy from the institution of therapy with imatinib in chronic phase CML patients has been estimated at 19 years 11. Similar results have been seen in children and youth, in whom CML seems to be biologically identical to that in adults 12. This is in contrast to the difference in molecular pathogenesis noted above for GIST. PDGF-alpha is expressed by many Ewing sarcoma cells, as is c-KIT. Imatinib demonstrated tumor kill in pre-clinical models of Ewing sarcoma 13, although questions were raised as to the mechanism of cytotoxicity. In CML cells, drug levels causing inhibition of the BCR/ABL oncogene were similar to those causing cell kill, whereas in Ewing, far higher levels were needed to kill cells than to inhibit c-KIT or PDGF-alpha, suggesting that their expression are not strictly linked to malignant cell survival 14. A Children's Oncology Group phase II study confirmed the absence of clinical activity of imatinib in patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma 15. However, recent in vitro studies in Ewing cell lines have shown synergy of the combination of imatinib and an insulin-like growth factor I receptor inhibitor 16. We are beginning to understand the molecular basis of cancer, and beginning to unravel the similarities and differences in cancers of similar histology in adults, children, and youth. We are also beginning to target some of those cancers effectively based on understanding the underlying molecular biological mechanisms. The examples discussed show that there is much still to learn as we translate new findings in the laboratory into more effective therapies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,072

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatric Blood & CancerMême sujetGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207