MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055426083 · doi:10.1002/pbc.21937

Hits and misses in targeting pediatric cancers

2009· letter· en· W2055426083 on OpenAlexaff
Mark L. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2009
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiSTMedicineImatinibInterstitial cell of CajalImatinib mesylatePlatelet-derived growth factor receptorOncologyInternal medicineTyrosine kinaseTyrosine-kinase inhibitorChemotherapyStromal tumorStromal cellCancer researchCancerImmunohistochemistryGrowth factorReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms of the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), first described in the early 1980s 1. Gain-of-function mutations of c-KIT as a cause of these tumors were first postulated based on the converse: loss-of-function mutations caused depletion of ICCs in mouse models. The linkage between c-KIT mutation and GIST was definitively demonstrated subsequently in human tumors 2. About 85% of GISTs in adults have c-KIT mutations. A further 5–10% of adult GIST have gain-of-function mutations in platelet-derived-growth-factor (PDGF)-alpha 2. At around the same time these mutations were being described, imatinib, an inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT and PDGF-alpha was being developed by a team at Novartis. Pre-clinical testing demonstrated the activity of imatinib against GIST cell lines and a primary GIST culture from a surgical resection specimen 3. GISTs are poorly responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Prior to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, only surgery was effective in their treatment. It was therefore reasonable to test the effectiveness of imatinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST. The results of a randomized phase II study comparing two dose levels of imatinib showed good activity with little difference between the study arms, with median time to progression of 24 months, and median duration of survival of 57 months 4. Similar results were reported by the same group in a larger phase III study: median progression-free survival 18 months, median overall survival 55 months 5. The best results were in patients whose tumors harbored c-KIT exon 11 mutations (median survival 63 months), a finding confirmed by the same group in a correlative study of kinase genotype and clinical outcome 6. A small group of 13 patients had tumors which were histologically GISTs, but c-KIT-negative. While those patients responded to initial therapy with imatinib, they had significantly shorter overall survival than did patients whose tumors were c-KIT-positive (31 vs. 53 months, P = 0.02) 4. Patients whose tumors expressed wild-type c-KIT had an inferior outcome when compared with those whose tumors had an exon 11 c-KIT mutant protein 6. Pediatric patients have GISTs which express non-mutated (wild-type) c-KIT 7. The study by Janeway et al. reported in this issue includes a small series of pediatric patients and demonstrates that pediatric patients have short-lived responses to imatinib, and generally longer responses to the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib 8. Adult GIST patients with wild-type c-KIT similarly have relatively favorable responses to sunitinib 9. The responses to imatinib reported in GIST are shorter lived than in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib results in 97% complete hematologic response in patients with chronic phase CML and complete cytogenetic response in 82% (reviewed 10). Estimated 5-year progression free survival is 84%, estimated 5-year survival without progression to accelerated or blast phase is 93%, and 95% of patients survive 5 years, if deaths unrelated to CML are excluded 10. Life expectancy from the institution of therapy with imatinib in chronic phase CML patients has been estimated at 19 years 11. Similar results have been seen in children and youth, in whom CML seems to be biologically identical to that in adults 12. This is in contrast to the difference in molecular pathogenesis noted above for GIST. PDGF-alpha is expressed by many Ewing sarcoma cells, as is c-KIT. Imatinib demonstrated tumor kill in pre-clinical models of Ewing sarcoma 13, although questions were raised as to the mechanism of cytotoxicity. In CML cells, drug levels causing inhibition of the BCR/ABL oncogene were similar to those causing cell kill, whereas in Ewing, far higher levels were needed to kill cells than to inhibit c-KIT or PDGF-alpha, suggesting that their expression are not strictly linked to malignant cell survival 14. A Children's Oncology Group phase II study confirmed the absence of clinical activity of imatinib in patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma 15. However, recent in vitro studies in Ewing cell lines have shown synergy of the combination of imatinib and an insulin-like growth factor I receptor inhibitor 16. We are beginning to understand the molecular basis of cancer, and beginning to unravel the similarities and differences in cancers of similar histology in adults, children, and youth. We are also beginning to target some of those cancers effectively based on understanding the underlying molecular biological mechanisms. The examples discussed show that there is much still to learn as we translate new findings in the laboratory into more effective therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207