A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Trial of Once-Daily Oral Chelator Deferasirox to Treat Iron Overload in HFE-Related Hereditary Hemochromatosis: Final Results of the Core Study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1514 Poster Board I-537 Background and aims Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive iron overload through increased intestinal absorption. Phlebotomy treatment is the standard of care, but compliance is variable and some patients are poor candidates due to underlying medical disorders and/or poor venous access. An oral iron chelator such as deferasirox (Exjade®) may provide an alternative treatment option for HH patients. Methods This is an inter-patient dose-escalation study of deferasirox (5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg) administered daily for 24 weeks to C282Y HFE homozygous HH patients with a pre-treatment serum ferritin (SF) value of 300–2000 ng/mL, transferrin saturation ≥45% and no known history of cirrhosis. A 6-month extension of this trial has recently been completed. The primary endpoint is the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints include change in SF, time to SF normalization (<100 ng/mL), longitudinal course of SF, and pharmacokinetics of deferasirox. Results 49 patients were enrolled and 48 patients were treated (33 men, 16 women; mean age 50.6 years; mean of 3.1 years since HH diagnosis) with deferasirox 5 (n=11), 10 (n=15) or 15 mg/kg/day (n=23) for at least 24 weeks. 37 (75.5%) patients completed the study (10 [90.9%], 11 [73.3%]; 16 [69.6%] patients in the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. The most common reasons for discontinuation were AEs in 3 (20.0%) patients and 4 (17.4%) patients in the 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. Bayesian analysis and medical review were performed between dose escalations. Meaningful reductions in SF were observed across the first three dose groups (median decrease -31.1%, -52.8% and -55.4% in the 3 groups respectively), and escalation to 20 mg/kg/day was not undertaken. Time course of the SF decline was dose-dependent (Figure). AEs in the core were dose dependent and consistent with the known safety profile of deferasirox. The most common drug-related AEs (≥10% in all patients) reported were diarrhea in 1 (9%), 4 (27%) and 9 (39%) patients, nausea in 0 (0%), 2 (13%) and 4 (17%) patients and abdominal pain in 0 (0%), 2 (13%), 3 (13%) patients in the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. One patient had ALT >5X upper limit of normal, and 11 patients had serum creatinine ≥33% over baseline and upper limit of normal on two consecutive occasions. All resolved with dose cessation or modification. Conclusions The results from the CORE trial suggest that deferasirox doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day are effective at reducing iron burden in HH patients. Based on the safety profile, only the 5 and 10 mg/kg/day doses are being considered for further study in this population. The results of the 24 week extension phase will be available at the time of the meeting. Larger studies are required to define the appropriate treatment regimen in HH. Disclosures Phatak: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Brissot:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bonkovsky:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinuvel: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding. Niederau:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Honoraria. Griffel:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lynch:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Schoenborn-Kellenberger:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».