MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Trial of Once-Daily Oral Chelator Deferasirox to Treat Iron Overload in HFE-Related Hereditary Hemochromatosis: Final Results of the Core Study.

2009· article· en· W2245158690 on OpenAlexaff
Pradyumna D. Phatak, Pierre Brissot, Herbert L. Bonkovsky, Mark Wurster, Lawrie W. Powell, Claus Niederau, Paul C. Adams, Wolfgang Stremmel, Louis Griffel, Nicola Lynch, Oliver Schönborn‐Kellenberger, Antonello Pietrangelo

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeferasiroxMedicineHereditary hemochromatosisInternal medicineGastroenterologyDiscontinuationAdverse effectClinical endpointTransferrin saturationPhlebotomyChelation therapyPediatricsAnemiaHemochromatosisThalassemiaClinical trialIron deficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1514 Poster Board I-537 Background and aims Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive iron overload through increased intestinal absorption. Phlebotomy treatment is the standard of care, but compliance is variable and some patients are poor candidates due to underlying medical disorders and/or poor venous access. An oral iron chelator such as deferasirox (Exjade®) may provide an alternative treatment option for HH patients. Methods This is an inter-patient dose-escalation study of deferasirox (5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg) administered daily for 24 weeks to C282Y HFE homozygous HH patients with a pre-treatment serum ferritin (SF) value of 300–2000 ng/mL, transferrin saturation ≥45% and no known history of cirrhosis. A 6-month extension of this trial has recently been completed. The primary endpoint is the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints include change in SF, time to SF normalization (<100 ng/mL), longitudinal course of SF, and pharmacokinetics of deferasirox. Results 49 patients were enrolled and 48 patients were treated (33 men, 16 women; mean age 50.6 years; mean of 3.1 years since HH diagnosis) with deferasirox 5 (n=11), 10 (n=15) or 15 mg/kg/day (n=23) for at least 24 weeks. 37 (75.5%) patients completed the study (10 [90.9%], 11 [73.3%]; 16 [69.6%] patients in the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. The most common reasons for discontinuation were AEs in 3 (20.0%) patients and 4 (17.4%) patients in the 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. Bayesian analysis and medical review were performed between dose escalations. Meaningful reductions in SF were observed across the first three dose groups (median decrease -31.1%, -52.8% and -55.4% in the 3 groups respectively), and escalation to 20 mg/kg/day was not undertaken. Time course of the SF decline was dose-dependent (Figure). AEs in the core were dose dependent and consistent with the known safety profile of deferasirox. The most common drug-related AEs (≥10% in all patients) reported were diarrhea in 1 (9%), 4 (27%) and 9 (39%) patients, nausea in 0 (0%), 2 (13%) and 4 (17%) patients and abdominal pain in 0 (0%), 2 (13%), 3 (13%) patients in the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. One patient had ALT >5X upper limit of normal, and 11 patients had serum creatinine ≥33% over baseline and upper limit of normal on two consecutive occasions. All resolved with dose cessation or modification. Conclusions The results from the CORE trial suggest that deferasirox doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg/day are effective at reducing iron burden in HH patients. Based on the safety profile, only the 5 and 10 mg/kg/day doses are being considered for further study in this population. The results of the 24 week extension phase will be available at the time of the meeting. Larger studies are required to define the appropriate treatment regimen in HH. Disclosures Phatak: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Brissot:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bonkovsky:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinuvel: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding. Niederau:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Honoraria. Griffel:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lynch:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Schoenborn-Kellenberger:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207