Association for Library Collections & Technical Services Annual Report 2003-2004
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As articulated in its Strategic Plan for 2001-2005, the mission of the Association for Library- Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS) is to provide leadership to the library and information communities in developing principles, standards, and best practices for creating, collecting, organizing, delivering, and preserving information resources in all forms. ALCTS strives to provide this leadership through its members by fostering educational, research, and professional service opportunities. Of the many objectives included in the ALCTS Strategic Plan, the division focused on three during 2003-2004: organization: publication; and education. Organization In spring 2003, the ALCTS membership passed a bylaw change enabling the development and use of a new of ALCTS' organizational structure, the Interest Group. The interest group category merges the programmatic and publication capabilities of a committee with the open forum and expanded membership characteristics of a discussion group. At its 2003 annual meeting in Toronto, the ALCTS Board substantively addressed its own composition and its relationships with division-and section-level groups within ALCTS. One of the outcomes of these discussions was the notion of the committee, defined as one whose role is primarily management of the business of the division. It was agreed that such committees included Budget and Finance, Education, Fundraising, International Relations, Leadership Development, Membership, Nominating, Organization and Bylaws, Planning, Program, and Publications. In addition, the board agreed that all other division-level committees were topical in nature and that their work would best be carried forward in the interest group format. Each was, therefore, offered the opportunity to reconstitute itself as an interest group or to disband. To date, three have chosen to reconstitute themselves as interest groups, three are considering the possibility; and one has decided to disband. While, as noted above, the International Relations Committee will continue to function as one of the division's business committees, the ALCTS Board has reconstituted the committee's membership and has revised its charge in order to expand the work of the committee in support of the division's goals in the international arena. Publication Under the dynamic leadership of Publications Committee chair Genevieve S. Owens, ALCTS reinvigorated its publications program virtually from top to bottom. Owens worked with executive director Charles Wilt to craft the division's publishing business plan. Within that framework, then, she systematized the calendar and editorial processes for the division's publications. The period 2003-2004 saw turnover in two of the division's key editorial positions, namely, the editors of the scholarly journal Library Research & Technical Services (LRTS) and the monographic series ALCTS Papers on Technical Services and Collections. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,017 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,181 | 0,220 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».